On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2016 05:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: >>> Previously, all ct() actions applied to localnet ports used the default >>> conntrack zone. We should allocate a ct zone ID for all localnet ports >>> just like we do for all local VIFs so that none of our connection >>> tracking interferes with any base system connection tracking in the >>> default zone. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> >> >> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> >> > > Thanks! I pushed this series to master. > > I started backporting this to branch-2.5. There's some conflicts and > then the test case seems to lock up my laptop. At that point I wondered > how much we care about OVN backports to branch-2.5 because we're very > quickly going to get to where we'd want anyone doing real OVN testing to > use ovs master again as we add more features and performance enhancements. > From my perspective, we'll be using master, so I'm ok with only dealing with that. But I can see some benefit to trying to keep things like this in 2.5 as well, so I defer to your and other's judgement.
> -- > Russell Bryant > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
