On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 03:50:26PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > Python 2 had range() and xrange(). xrange() is more efficient, but > behaves differently so range() was retained for compatibility. Python 3 > only has range() and it behaves like Python 2's xrange(). > > Remove explicit use of xrange() and use six.moves.range() to > make sure we're using xrange() from Python 2 or range() from Python 3. > > Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org>
I don't feel comfortable reviewing more patches from this series given the patch conflicts I'm getting and the uncertainty I have with the particular incremental I suggested for debian/control in the previous patch. If you'll rebase and repost I'll start again. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
