On 30.12.2015 17:32, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> I just checked and the traffic is generated after everything is already set
> up, ports and flows.
And what is this 50K packets in that case?
main thread:
emc hits:20341
megaflow hits:0
miss:10193
lost:20372
>
> On 30 December 2015 at 08:50, Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>> wrote:
>
> The transmission starts before the addition of dpdkr4 to ovs?
>
> On 30.12.2015 16:31, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > Dear Ilya,
> >
> > ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-stats-show -> http://pastebin.com/k1nnMfQZ
> > ovs-appctl coverage/show -> http://pastebin.com/617CYR4n
> > ovs-appctl dpctl/show -> http://pastebin.com/JFCT8tgS
> > ovs-log -> http://pastebin.com/sJkaF20M
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > On 30 December 2015 at 08:05, Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com
> <mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > On 30.12.2015 15:51, Mauricio Vásquez wrote:
> > > Hello Ilya,
> > >
> > > The dpdkr ports involved have just one TX queue, so it should not
> be the reason in this case.
> > >
> >
> > Please, provide output of:
> > ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-stats-show
> > ovs-appctl coverage/show
> > ovs-appctl dpctl/show
> > and log of ovs-vswitchd.
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
