On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org> wrote: >> One other thing that I noticed is that the STT fragment hash table >> commingles fragments that were addressed to different destination >> ports. This is unlikely to matter with the current implementation but >> I'm not sure that it is right. > > STT fragment hash table has ack_seq which should be unique across > different stt-dst-ports. So I am not sure if we need to check dst_port > in the fragment lookup.
Yes, I think that it is fine with the current implementation on the transmit side. However, I guess that assuming this on the receive side is probably not the "right" thing to do. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
