On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: > Keep devices in UP state in stt-list. So that devices in UP state > would be searched on a packet receive in STT. This way devices in > DOWN state would not accept any packets. > > Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>
I think this works but it seems like it deviates from the other tunnel types more than is desirable. The difference between those and STT is that STT does not have a hash table used to look up devices in the non-OVS case. However, it might be good to keep STT as close to upstream best practices as possible even if it isn't immediately necessary. One other thing that I noticed is that the STT fragment hash table commingles fragments that were addressed to different destination ports. This is unlikely to matter with the current implementation but I'm not sure that it is right. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
