On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote:
> hi, > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Flavio Fernandes <ffern...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:41 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@midokura.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> These tests are racy as nothing prevents packet re-ordering. > >> Fix them by sorting outputs before comparing. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@midokura.com> > >> > > > > Reviewed-by: Flavio Fernandes <ffern...@redhat.com> > > i've already merged this patch. > anyway, thank you for review! > > np, Takashi! I have a slow machine and i found another issue in the test. it has to do with the "sleep 1" that right before [vtep-ctl]. I would like to replace that sleep 1 with a max retry loop, so it is faster [or slower], depending on the dut. i will submit a patch [in a few days] and ask for your review. :) Best, -- flavio [1]: ... vtep-ctl bind-ls br-vtep br-vtep_n2 0 lsw0 https://gist.github.com/anonymous/95302f21dedcae9c26fc#file-gistify935119-txt-L10 > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > dev@openvswitch.org > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
