On 10/08/2015 01:06 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
Sorry, correct a typo:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote:
This would be a very interesting feature. But would it become scaling
bottleneck if each HV need to be programmed to hold all the logical
router flows (because it doesn't know whom could it be talking to)?
I think already openstack neutron is following above approach.
Thanks
Or would it be a reactive approach that when the first ARP is
Definitely not ARP here. I was supposed to say: the first packet
destined to a subnet belonging to a logical router that is yet unknown
to the source HV.
initiated from a VIF, the local controller request the ovn-sb DB for
the related logical router path?
Han
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
