Sorry, correct a typo: On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This would be a very interesting feature. But would it become scaling > bottleneck if each HV need to be programmed to hold all the logical > router flows (because it doesn't know whom could it be talking to)? > Or would it be a reactive approach that when the first ARP is Definitely not ARP here. I was supposed to say: the first packet destined to a subnet belonging to a logical router that is yet unknown to the source HV. > initiated from a VIF, the local controller request the ovn-sb DB for > the related logical router path? > Han _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
