On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 04:40:41PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:39:01PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > > Introduce a new "direction" column to the ACL table that accepts the > > values "to-lport" and "from-lport". Also reserve the ACL priority 65535 > > for return traffic associated with the "allow-related" action. > > > > Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> > > I'd prefer to squash this with the commit (presumably patch 2/2) that > actually implements the newly documented behavior.
Oh, I see that 2/2 doesn't. Why not? It shouldn't be hard, at least not to divide the ACLs into ingress and egress pipelines; I do understand that the stateful ACLs are more work. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
