Hi, Ben. It sounds good.
Thank you for kind reply. I will try. Thanks, Junguk 2015-08-26 12:54 GMT-04:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>: > OK. > > OVS using DPDK can connect physical machines without using the special > drivers for VM support. I don't know whether the OVS build requires > them to be present. > > OpenFlow controllers should be able to control OVS with DPDK in the same > way as OVS without DPDK. > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:52:30PM -0400, Junguk Cho wrote: > > I am sorry that I am not clear about term. > > My question is about OVS. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Junguk > > > > 2015-08-26 12:49 GMT-04:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:47:39PM -0400, Junguk Cho wrote: > > > > In OVS 2.4 version, it includes DPDK as mainstream since there is > > > > INSTALL.DPDK.md. > > > > Is it different from OVDK? > > > > In other words, OVS + DPDK in version OVS 2.4 is not OVDK? > > > > > > OVDK is Intel's fork. Open vSwitch is just Open vSwitch or "OVS". We > > > don't call it OVDK. > > > > > > Are your questions about OVS or OVDK? > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
