Thank you for reply and I am very clear. Is there some work which compares default ovs and ovs with dpdk in terms of performance like throughput?
Thanks. Junguk On Aug 25, 2015 4:00 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:48:17PM -0400, Junguk Cho wrote: > > My first question is how DPDK works with OVS. > > Since OVS has two tables in user space and kernel space, the second > packet > > is matched in kernel tables after one packet is missed and controller > > inserts correct flow. > > In this case, DPDK is not very effective. > > Or with DPDK, entire kernel table is not used? > > With DPDK, the kernel is not used. > > > Does DPDK with OVS implement tunneling like GRE? > > Yes, it is documented in README-native-tunneling.md. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
