On 08/03/2015 03:36 AM, Amitabha Biswas wrote: > Hi, > > I think Gal is saying the following - ml2 allows the following: > > VM (10.0.0.2) --- Logical_Switch ---- (10.0.0.2) LogicalRouter > | | > | | > VM (10.0.1.2) ----+ +-----(10.0.1.2) LogicalRouter > > The Logical Switch (OVN_NB) has a one to one mapping to a Logical Datapath > (OVN_SB). > > An alternate schema could be to map Subnets to a Logical Switch instead of > mapping a Neutron Network to a Logical Switch. This would preserve the > requirement of a single router port in the Logical Switch table.
I don't think we'd be implementing the Neutron API properly at that point. It's my understanding that a Neutron network is supposed to be a single L2 domain. I wonder if the above is ever actually used in practice, even if technically possible. Is there a reason someone would prefer the above example topology instead of putting each subnet on its own network? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
