Yes, i checked this on my setup.
For example, you can have both IPv6 and IPv4 subnets per the same network
(which maps to a logical switch)
and connect both as two different router ports (to the same router)

You can also connect the same network to two different routers, i am not
sure if you need the extra route extension for that or not, i think you
could
configure it as default gateway with out this extension, but with the
extension you
can define routing between the two routers.





On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

> [adding Aaron Rosen]
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:20:30PM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> > Currently Neutron support defining few subnets (IP cidrs) on a network
> > (logical switch)
> > and connecting them to the same router (or different routers).
> > Currently in the NB schema, the logical switch can be connected only to
> one
> > logical
> > router port.
> >
> > This needs to be extended so a logical switch can have more then one
> > logical router
> > port reference to support the above use case.
>
> Limiting a logical switch to a single router port is an intentional
> design decision.  It means that a packet traverses at most two logical
> switches (one at ingress, one at egress), which simplifies some of the
> logical switch design, and it prevents loops.
>
> VMware's NVP controller uses the same design, for those reasons and
> others.  The NVP paper from NSDI 2014 (see
> http://benpfaff.org/papers/net-virt.pdf) puts it this way:
>
>     As an optimization, we constrain the logical topology such that
>     logical L2 destinations can only be present at its edge[6].  This
>     restriction means that the OVS flow table of a sending hypervisor
>     needs only to have flows for logical datapaths to which its local
>     VMs are attached as well as those of the L3 routers of the logical
>     topology; the receiving hypervisor is determined by the logical IP
>     destination address, leaving the last logical L2 hop to be executed
>     at the receiving hypervisor.
>
>     [6] We have found little value in supporting logical routers
>         interconnected through logical switches without tenant VMs.
>
> Are you sure that Neutron supports multiple router ports per switch?
> Russell Bryant (in IRC) and Aaron Rosen (in a quick in-person chat)
> seemed doubtful.
>



-- 
Best Regards ,

The G.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to