On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 07:13:30 AM Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:10:35PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > On 01/20/15 at 01:08pm, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 04:38:21 AM Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:03:59AM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > > The RFC4541 section 2.1.1 item 1 allows the snooping switch > > > > > to provide an administrative control to allow Report messages > > > > > to be flooded to ports not connected to multicast routers. > > > > > > > > > > This is useful for tunnels and patch ports in order to send > > > > > Reports across switches. > > > > > > > > > > Flavio Leitner (2): > > > > > mcast_snoop: make mcast_fport_bundle generic > > > > > mcast-snoop: Add support to control Reports forwarding > > > > > > > > It looks like patch 1 didn't make it to my inbox or the list archive. I > > > > do see patch 2. > > > > > > I received the CC from both patches. > > > Anyway, let me see if I can resend patch 1 again. > > > > I had the same issue a couple of weeks back. I had to tweak the > > commit message a bit to have the patch make it through. > > What was the key change to the commit message? (I guess you might have > to describe it instead of showing it, if something in the change is > triggering a filter somewhere.)
I sent the patch again with CC to you, hopefully you will get a copy. I also left a public copy in case others want to see it: http://people.redhat.com/fleitner/ovs-igmp-snoop/ Any idea what I have to change to make the patch reach the list? fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
