On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 04:35:28PM +0530, Shashwat Srivastava wrote:
> Query 1: Will the testcase for table status messages (where vacancy reason
> value can be OFPTR_VACANCY_UP or OFPTR_VACANCY_DOWN) be written in
> [ofproto - asynchronous message control (OpenFlow 1.5)] block or shall we
> make a new block for OpenFlow1.4 async messages for table Status async
> messages ?
I suggest adding a new test case, since OF1.4 and OF1.5 are somewhat
different.
> Query 2: Is the hex-string used
> (061F00180000000003000000000000000008000000000000) correct for
> OFPTR_VACANCY_UP reason for table_status_messages ?
You can use "ovs-ofctl ofp-print" to print the contents of an OpenFlow
hexstring if you are unsure. In this case:
$ utilities/ovs-ofctl ofp-print
061F00180000000003000000000000000008000000000000
2014-12-12T03:08:01Z|00001|ofp_msgs|WARN|unknown OpenFlow message (version
6, type 31)
***decode error: OFPBRC_BAD_TYPE***
00000000 06 1f 00 18 00 00 00 00-03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
00000010 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00- |........ |
> Query 3: While running the testcase it fails at check_async 2. Why does it
> fails in check_async 2 if our changes are only in check_async 3 ?
> Also here the monitor.log file contains TABLE_STATUS message along with
> PORT_STATUS messages. Whereas it should contain only PORT_STATUS messages.
It sounds like you wrote or modified a testcase, but I don't think I've
seen your code so I don't feel comfortable speculating on why the
testcase doesn't pass.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
