On 11 December 2014 at 14:05, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote: >> The UFID parameter to dpif_flow_get() is optional, but the current >> implementation dereferences it to initialize part of the output flow. >> This field is filled in by the dpif implementation, so don't initialize >> it here. >> >> This could cause a NULL dereference if a dpif_flow_get() caller doesn't >> provide a UFID. Currently there are no such callers, but the next patch >> will introduce one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > The title of the patch makes this sound like a bug fix, but the > explanation later on sounds like it would only be a real bug if the > callers were changed. Is there a bug that can currently be triggered?
No, it cannot be triggered currently. Perhaps this could be rolled into the next patch, or renamed. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
