On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> The UFID parameter to dpif_flow_get() is optional, but the current
> implementation dereferences it to initialize part of the output flow.
> This field is filled in by the dpif implementation, so don't initialize
> it here.
> 
> This could cause a NULL dereference if a dpif_flow_get() caller doesn't
> provide a UFID. Currently there are no such callers, but the next patch
> will introduce one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>

Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>

The title of the patch makes this sound like a bug fix, but the
explanation later on sounds like it would only be a real bug if the
callers were changed.  Is there a bug that can currently be triggered?

Thanks,

Ben.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to