On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:02:32PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > Previously we masked labels not present in the incoming packet. > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
Nice improvement. Here, I think I meant to write "second or later", which also makes sense if we increase FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS: > - * If the new label is the second or label MPLS label in 'flow', it is > + * If the new label is the second or third label MPLS label in 'flow', it is The change to mf_is_all_wild() looks to me like a bug fix that should be backported. I'd drop the 'wc' parameter from commit_mpls_action() instead of marking it unused. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
