On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 05:24:12PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:18:57PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> > In our experience, most people actually expect this number to be >> > fairly high. For example, our traffic generator runs a little bit of >> > traffic to populate caches, pauses for a couple of seconds, before >> > finally starting the main test. On top of that, we've had some minor >> > complaints from people managing deployments about how low this number >> > is. >> > >> > Originally we used 1.5 seconds because the flow revalidation was so >> > slow that we wanted to seriously limit the size of the flow table to >> > be sure we can keep up. However, now that we've made such scale >> > improvements, bumping the default up seems reasonable. >> > >> > All of that said, we don't feel all that strongly about this change, >> > is there a specific concern you have? Perhaps we can address it... >> >> Not anymore, you addressed all my concerns in your reply. >> Thanks for explaining it, > > Ethan, I hope you will add this context to the commit message?
Oops, Ethan isn't the author and it's already been committed. Never mind.... _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
