On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 07:48:10AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> >> Commit d73105839 (netdev-dpdk: Move to DPDK 1.7.0) added
> >> 'vswitchd_ovs_vswitchd_LDFLAGS' in acinclude.m4. This caused the
> >> created Makefile to use 'vswitchd_ovs_vswitchd_LINK' without
> >> including 'AM_LDFLAGS'. This causes failure while building ovs-vswitchd
> >> with external libraries (ex: ovs-vswitchd on Windows with openssl.)
> >>
> >> This commit adds 'AM_LDFLAGS' to the new 'vswitchd_ovs_vswitchd_LDFLAGS'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty <gshe...@nicira.com>
> >
> > I didn't review commit d73105839 until now.  I don't think it's wise
> > to substitute an Automake-owned variable that way.  It's not commonly
> > done, so it might confuse readers (it would confuse me), and I doubt
> > that Automake guarantees that it will continue to work.
> >
> > I would rather see acinclude.m4 substitute some variable whose name is
> > not owned by Automake, e.g. DPDK_LDFLAGS, and then in automake.mk
> > write vswitchd_ovs_vswitchd_LDFLAGS = $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(DPDK_LDFLAGS).
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> Yes, it makes sense. Daniele will be sending an updated patch.

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to