Great, thanks. Looks good.

I'll leave it to whoever reviews the series as a whole to push this.
On Jun 26, 2014 6:36 PM, "Ryan Wilson 76511" <wr...@vmware.com> wrote:

>  Crap, its late in the day and I can't think / type apparently. Yes 0.04
> million is what I meant.
>
>  And I ran 2 more tests in the meantime with and without the patch and I
> got a 0.03 and 0.04 million PPS increase, respectively. Nonetheless, the
> increase is fairly consistent over 5 different tests.
>
>  Ryan
>
>   From: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> Date: Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:26 PM
> To: Ryan Wilson <wr...@vmware.com>
> Cc: Ryan Wilson <wr...@nicira.com>, "dev@openvswitch.org" <
> dev@openvswitch.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] netdev-dpdk: Add OVS_UNLIKELY
> annotations in dpdk_do_tx_copy().
>
>   .4 million or .04 million? There's a big difference.
> On Jun 26, 2014 6:24 PM, "Ryan Wilson 76511" <wr...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>>  Its between 0.2 - 0.6 million PPS increase after running 3 tests with
>> and without this patch. So I went with the average of 0.4 :)
>>
>>  And we actually use these annotations elsewhere in netdev_dpdk_send()
>> where we measure size of packets and dropped packets, so it would be nice
>> to add these annotations for code consistency as well.
>>
>>  Ryan
>>
>>   From: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>> Date: Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:20 PM
>> To: Ryan Wilson <wr...@nicira.com>
>> Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org" <dev@openvswitch.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] netdev-dpdk: Add OVS_UNLIKELY
>> annotations in dpdk_do_tx_copy().
>>
>>   That's pretty impressive. Is the performance consistent enough to be
>> sure, then?
>>
>> In either case I don't object to the patch.
>> On Jun 26, 2014 6:17 PM, "Ryan Wilson" <wr...@nicira.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since dropped packets due to large packet size or lack of memory
>>> are unlikely, it is best to add OVS_UNLIKELY annotations to these
>>> conditions.
>>>
>>> With DPDK fast path forwarding test, this increased throughtput
>>> from 4.12 to 4.16 million packets per second.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wilson <wr...@nicira.com>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/netdev-dpdk.c |    4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
>>> index 0aee14e..03f1e02 100644
>>> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
>>> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
>>> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ dpdk_do_tx_copy(struct netdev *netdev, struct
>>> dpif_packet ** pkts, int cnt)
>>>
>>>      for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
>>>          int size = ofpbuf_size(&pkts[i]->ofpbuf);
>>> -        if (size > dev->max_packet_len) {
>>> +        if (OVS_UNLIKELY(size > dev->max_packet_len)) {
>>>              VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "Too big size %d max_packet_len %d",
>>>                           (int)size , dev->max_packet_len);
>>>
>>> @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ dpdk_do_tx_copy(struct netdev *netdev, struct
>>> dpif_packet ** pkts, int cnt)
>>>          newcnt++;
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -    if (dropped) {
>>> +    if (OVS_UNLIKELY(dropped)) {
>>>          ovs_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>>>          dev->stats.tx_dropped += dropped;
>>>          ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev mailing list
>>> dev@openvswitch.org
>>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=TfBS78Vw3dzttvXidhbffg%3D%3D%0A&m=wtH3lN2ST0E5hR7ESg7AwzXseDogoZZdb1KOoAV5uQ0%3D%0A&s=1542518c0ff9ce83f83a308a7e942d661a79c78b4fbac3e67a27b268c9d58df0>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to