That's pretty impressive. Is the performance consistent enough to be sure,
then?
In either case I don't object to the patch.
On Jun 26, 2014 6:17 PM, "Ryan Wilson" <wr...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Since dropped packets due to large packet size or lack of memory
> are unlikely, it is best to add OVS_UNLIKELY annotations to these
> conditions.
>
> With DPDK fast path forwarding test, this increased throughtput
> from 4.12 to 4.16 million packets per second.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wilson <wr...@nicira.com>
> ---
> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> index 0aee14e..03f1e02 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ dpdk_do_tx_copy(struct netdev *netdev, struct
> dpif_packet ** pkts, int cnt)
>
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> int size = ofpbuf_size(&pkts[i]->ofpbuf);
> - if (size > dev->max_packet_len) {
> + if (OVS_UNLIKELY(size > dev->max_packet_len)) {
> VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "Too big size %d max_packet_len %d",
> (int)size , dev->max_packet_len);
>
> @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ dpdk_do_tx_copy(struct netdev *netdev, struct
> dpif_packet ** pkts, int cnt)
> newcnt++;
> }
>
> - if (dropped) {
> + if (OVS_UNLIKELY(dropped)) {
> ovs_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> dev->stats.tx_dropped += dropped;
> ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
