Thx, I already pushed them, Forgot to mention in this thread.
Thanks, Alex Wang, On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > OK. I understand now. Do you still need any reviews? > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Hey Ben, > > > > Thanks for pointing it out, I actually do not have a clear judge on > this. > > I think it is necessary in this case, > > > > For branch-2.0, we are before the revalidator-as-a-thread era. So, it is > > pretty > > different from the implementation in commit 72310b04. > > > > For branch-1.11, 1.10, we need to configure the option on a different > table. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex Wang, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:20:57PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > >> > This patch adds a new configuration option, "max-idle" to the > >> > Bridge "other-config" column. This sets how long datapath flows, > >> > for the configured bridge, are cached in the datapath before > >> > ovs-vswitchd thread expires them. > >> > > >> > This commit is a backport of commit 72310b04 (upcall: Configure > >> > datapath max-idle through ovs-vsctl.). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> > >> > >> Were there significant changes in the backports? It's unusual to post > >> all the versions of a patch to backport, because backports are usually > >> straightforward, so that getting a review on each of them consumes > >> time for both the poster and the reviewer without much reduction of > >> risk. > > > > > > > > -- > "I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding > getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
