OK. I understand now. Do you still need any reviews? On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote: > Hey Ben, > > Thanks for pointing it out, I actually do not have a clear judge on this. > I think it is necessary in this case, > > For branch-2.0, we are before the revalidator-as-a-thread era. So, it is > pretty > different from the implementation in commit 72310b04. > > For branch-1.11, 1.10, we need to configure the option on a different table. > > Thanks, > Alex Wang, > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:20:57PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: >> > This patch adds a new configuration option, "max-idle" to the >> > Bridge "other-config" column. This sets how long datapath flows, >> > for the configured bridge, are cached in the datapath before >> > ovs-vswitchd thread expires them. >> > >> > This commit is a backport of commit 72310b04 (upcall: Configure >> > datapath max-idle through ovs-vsctl.). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> >> >> Were there significant changes in the backports? It's unusual to post >> all the versions of a patch to backport, because backports are usually >> straightforward, so that getting a review on each of them consumes >> time for both the poster and the reviewer without much reduction of >> risk. > >
-- "I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
