Thank you!  Also many thanks to Alex.

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:34:44AM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> OK, thanks. I'll push this patchset to master and branch-2.3 soon.
> 
> 
> On 4 June 2014 10:33, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:30:13AM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > > Would this incremental alleviate your concerns?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> > > index e8f3dbf..aa8cea1 100644
> > > --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> > > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> > > @@ -3000,11 +3000,11 @@ xlate_learn_action(struct xlate_ctx *ctx, const
> > > struct ofpact_learn *learn)
> > >          entry = xlate_cache_add_entry(ctx->xin->xcache, XC_LEARN);
> > >          entry->u.learn.ofproto = ctx->xbridge->ofproto;
> > >          entry->u.learn.fm = xmalloc(sizeof *entry->u.learn.fm);
> >
> > This is good:
> >
> > > -        entry->u.learn.ofpacts = ofpbuf_new(1024);
> > > +        entry->u.learn.ofpacts = ofpbuf_new(64);
> > >          xlate_learn_action__(ctx, learn, entry->u.learn.fm,
> > >                               entry->u.learn.ofpacts);
> > >      } else if (ctx->xin->may_learn) {
> >
> > I'd leave this out, though, since 1024 bytes of stack space doesn't
> > really cost anything:
> >
> > > -        uint64_t ofpacts_stub[1024 / 8];
> > > +        uint64_t ofpacts_stub[64 / 8];
> > >          struct ofputil_flow_mod fm;
> > >          struct ofpbuf ofpacts;
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ben.
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to