On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:38:33PM -0700, Ryan Wilson wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response.
No problem. > Unfortunately, I've had some issues with setting up an NVP perf > environment lately so I haven't gotten any numbers. When I do, I'll > publish them on this thread. > > Ethan's rationale is that it simplifies the code and we don't incur > the memory overhead of allocating a hash map and this would outweigh > the negative effect of possibly re-processing a packet from the same > flow. Since userspace forwarding has gotten so much faster, this > wouldn't be so bad. > > Obviously, I need perf numbers to justify these claims; I will post > them when I do. Thanks. Let me clarify that I would like to drop the complexity here too. I just want to be fairly confident that we won't have to reintroduce it. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
