> The almost equivalent function miniflow_equal_flow_in_minimask() does not > require the miniflow and minimask to have the same map, and it is slower for > it. However, it is only used by the test-classifier.c, so one option to > reduce the confusion would be to move it there. What do you think?
That sounds like a good option to me. > I suggest we work on this as on work-in-progress, and check the current > series in to get a stable basis for that work. Sounds reasonable. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
