Sounds good. Ethan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> In the cache_push_back function, you might consider using the >> x2nrealloc() function. >> > > I did not know this existed, thanks! > >> Does this actually help? I've found we spend most of our time getting >> the memory for the rule, not the subtable itself. >> > > After this series I see cache misses only on fetching the ‘next’ rule. > Before, I saw also misses for the subtable (being fetched via a next pointer > as well) and/or it’s mask. So this helps :-) > > Jarno > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
