On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 02:57:28PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: >>> I suppose the other possibility is to pass some kind of flag attribute >>> with messages indicating that this is a test probe and would silence >>> logging. Existing kernels would ignore this so they would still log >>> but the behavior would be otherwise unchanged. >> >> That makes me nervous--it poses the temptation of changing behavior in >> some other way, not just log-wise. > > How about a specific netlink (DP) command to set the logging level and > invoking it before and after probing?
I guess something seems vaguely wrong about this to me - it seems to assume too much about the kernel implementation. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
