Sorry, I hadn't got around to it yet. I'll repost.

On 4 March 2014 09:46, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

> Justin, are you planning to apply this then?  Or, Joe, are you planning
> to post a new version?  Just trying to figure out what's happening.
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:59:00AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> > I think it's clear enough, since it explicitly mentions datapath
> > flows.  There's a FAQ entry that describes the different types of
> > flows that Ben can point to, which always makes him happy.
> >
> > --Justin
> >
> >
> > On Feb 27, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree, it would be helpful to have a sentence like that.
> > >
> > > This could be particularly misleading given that it is relating to
> datapath flows, which is completely different from OpenFlow rule timeouts.
> Do you think that this is clear enough with the current description?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27 February 2014 10:50, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 27, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +            The maximum idle time in milliseconds for flows to be
> cached in the
> > > > +            datapath. A lower value may improve flow setup
> performance, but
> > > > +            decrease the number of cached flows in the datapath.
> Conversely, a
> > > > +            higher value allows more flows to be maintained in the
> cache at the
> > > > +            expense of flow setup performance.
> > >
> > > We get a lot of questions about locking particular flows in the
> kernel, and I'm afraid this description might give the impression that this
> will be the actual time it's kept in the kernel.  (The name of the variable
> indicates that that's not the case, but I think most people will miss
> that.)  What about adding a sentence like the following to the end?
> > >
> > > "Note that ovs-vswitchd may expire flows more quickly than the
> configured value based on system load and other factors."
> > >
> > > --Justin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to