sure,
> So the problem is that in error cases the ofpbuf packet member of upcall > has been uninitialized. The fix you propose works because all-zero ofpbuf > can be safely uninitialized. Yes, my fix is more like a hack that relies on this. > We have not documented this behavior anywhere, so I’m not sure if we > should rely on it. The alternative would be to properly initialize the > packet member also for error returns (and document whose responsibility it > is.). I’ll send a patch soon to this effect for you to review. > I'd like to review it, thx
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
