On 20 November 2013 10:59, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > I think we could delete netdev_dummy_changed() and > netdev_vport_changed() entirely and just call netdev_notify() from the > caller.
OK, sure. I can change the bsd version as well. > I think that every netdev construct function now calls netdev_notify(). > If so, I guess we could call it centrally from netdev_open(). I see. That sounds more consistent with moving the seq to the netdev provider layer. > I'd expect that bond_wait() should use netdev_seq_wait() instead of > a direct comparison followed by poll_immediate_wake(). I'll replace that. > In the new comment here: > + * although implementations should try to avoid this. netdev.c contains more > + * information about this notification interface. */ > I'd be more specific about where to look, naming the related functions. OK, thanks. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
