On 11/20/2013 10:14 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Graf <tg...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/19/2013 10:50 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:

Rather than using complete flow hash, we can use skb->rxhash for
calculating source port. Similar calculation is done by vxlan.

Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>
---
   datapath/vport-lisp.c |    9 +++------
   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/datapath/vport-lisp.c b/datapath/vport-lisp.c
index e4e603f..0938e84 100644
--- a/datapath/vport-lisp.c
+++ b/datapath/vport-lisp.c
@@ -165,16 +165,13 @@ static __be64 instance_id_to_tunnel_id(__u8 *iid)
    */
   static u16 get_src_port(struct sk_buff *skb)
   {
-       int low;
-       int high;
         unsigned int range;
-       struct sw_flow_key *pkt_key = OVS_CB(skb)->pkt_key;
-       u32 hash = jhash2((const u32 *)pkt_key,
-                         sizeof(*pkt_key) / sizeof(u32), 0);
+       int high;
+       int low;

         inet_get_local_port_range(&low, &high);
         range = (high - low) + 1;
-       return (((u64) hash * range) >> 32) + low;
+       return (((u64) skb_get_rxhash(skb) * range) >> 32) + low;
   }

   static void lisp_build_header(const struct vport *vport,


I might be missing something but what about the rxhash == 0 case?

VXLAN does:
         hash = skb_get_rxhash(skb);
         if (!hash)
                 hash = jhash(skb->data, 2 * ETH_ALEN,
                              (__force u32) skb->protocol);

Shouldn't we hash the pkt_key then?

LISP is an L3 protocol rather than L2 like VXLAN so we're guaranteed
to have at least IP addresses to hash in skb_get_rxhash().

Right, unless skb_flow_dissect() fails which I think could be triggered
when an invalid GRE header is encapsulated on top of IP inside LISP.
Basically any header violation caught by skb_flow_dissect() that is not
caught by the flow extraction. An attacker could use such packets to
force unhashed source ports to overload a load balancer.

Same could happen if the RX NIC RSS results in 0, i.e.
(skb->l4_rxhash && !skb->rxhash)

VXLAN would handle these fine right now.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to