+1
> On 20.11.2013, at 00:17, "Ethan Jackson" <et...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Ben's the authority on this, but FWIW a macro sounds fine to me. > We've already got PRI_U32 etc, adding a PRI_ZU seems reasonable. > > Ethan > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Alessandro Pilotti > <apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote: >> Talking about %zu, we solved it with a brutal macro. Do you have any >> suggestion for a better approach? >> >> >> >>> On 19 Nov 2013, at 18:51 , Gurucharan Shetty <shet...@nicira.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:22:40PM +0000, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: >>>>> The freshly released Visual Studio 2013 is the minimum supported >>>>> version due to its improved C99 support that avoided us a few >>>>> headaches. >>>> >>>> Guru, have you been using the compiler from VS2013? I see that it still >>>> does not implement %zu even 14 years after it was standardized, but I >>>> guess that some of the other fixes should help us write good code, in >>>> particular http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/hh409293.aspx >>>> says that VS2013: >>>> >>>> Supports these ISO C99 language features: >>>> >>>> _Bool >>>> >>>> Compound literals. >>>> >>>> Designated initializers. >>>> >>>> Mixing declarations with code. >>>> >>>> and the first three of those in particular are a breath of fresh air. >>> I think the team here has been using VS2012. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> dev@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
