Ben's the authority on this, but FWIW a macro sounds fine to me. We've already got PRI_U32 etc, adding a PRI_ZU seems reasonable.
Ethan On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Alessandro Pilotti <apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote: > Talking about %zu, we solved it with a brutal macro. Do you have any > suggestion for a better approach? > > > > On 19 Nov 2013, at 18:51 , Gurucharan Shetty <shet...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:22:40PM +0000, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: >>>> The freshly released Visual Studio 2013 is the minimum supported >>>> version due to its improved C99 support that avoided us a few >>>> headaches. >>> >>> Guru, have you been using the compiler from VS2013? I see that it still >>> does not implement %zu even 14 years after it was standardized, but I >>> guess that some of the other fixes should help us write good code, in >>> particular http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/hh409293.aspx >>> says that VS2013: >>> >>> Supports these ISO C99 language features: >>> >>> _Bool >>> >>> Compound literals. >>> >>> Designated initializers. >>> >>> Mixing declarations with code. >>> >>> and the first three of those in particular are a breath of fresh air. >> I think the team here has been using VS2012. > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
