2013/11/12 17:36 "YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamam...@valinux.co.jp>:
>
> > +enum rule_dpif_lookup_verdict
> > +rule_dpif_lookup_from_table(struct ofproto_dpif *ofproto,
> > + const struct flow *flow, struct
flow_wildcards *wc,
> > + uint8_t *table_id, struct rule_dpif **rule)
> > +{
> > + enum ofp_table_config config = OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_MAX;
> > + uint8_t id = *table_id;
> > +
> > + while (1) {
> > + bool is_empty;
> > +
> > + if (rule_dpif_lookup_in_table__(ofproto, flow, wc, id,
> > + &is_empty, rule)) {
> > + return RULE_DPIF_LOOKUP_VERDICT_MATCH;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!is_empty) {
> > + *table_id = id;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (config >= OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_MAX) {
> > + config = table_get_config(&ofproto->up, id);
> > + config &= OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_MASK;
> > + }
>
> does this mean, call table_get_config only for the first table?
Thanks Yamamoto-san,
I'll fix that.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
