On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]> wrote:
> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.h b/datapath/datapath.h
> index 879a830..5a89e0e 100644
> --- a/datapath/datapath.h
> +++ b/datapath/datapath.h
> @@ -53,29 +53,29 @@
> * up per packet.
> */
> struct dp_stats_percpu {
> + struct u64_stats_sync sync;
> + u64 n_mask_hit;
> u64 n_hit;
> u64 n_missed;
> u64 n_lost;
> - u64 n_mask_hit;
> - struct u64_stats_sync sync;
Can you update the comment to match the struct changes?
> diff --git a/datapath/flow.h b/datapath/flow.h
> index d1ac85a..bab87c3 100644
> --- a/datapath/flow.h
> +++ b/datapath/flow.h
> @@ -156,14 +156,13 @@ struct sw_flow_stats {
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> struct sw_flow {
> - struct rcu_head rcu;
> struct hlist_node hash_node[2];
> - u32 hash;
> -
> - struct sw_flow_key key;
> - struct sw_flow_key unmasked_key;
> struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
> + struct sw_flow_key key;
> struct sw_flow_actions __rcu *sf_acts;
> + struct sw_flow_key unmasked_key;
> + u32 hash;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> struct sw_flow_stats stats[];
> };
I was surprised that we don't look at the hash in the fast path to
avoid doing a comparison in the face of collisions. It seems we don't
but can you think of a reason why not? I think we used to.
Should we also sort struct table_instance for consistency? I realize
that it's currently less than a cache line but it is in the fast path.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
