On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:48:55PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > On Sep 24, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:42:41PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > I slightly prefer %# over 0x% in the following cases, because 0 looks > > a little less silly than 0x0: > > "%#03" would print zero as "000". My intent was to output the flags as > "0xXXX", where "XXX" are hex digits corresponding to the 12 flags bits, so at > to make the width of the flags field explicit. > However, if you think the flags should be printed without zero padding in the > front, I'm more than happy to change this as you suggested.
Do we zero-pad other fields? I don't usually favor that kind of formatting. Do you think that it is especially important for this field? Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
