On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4 >> index 73ee5ce..e754cfa 100644 >> --- a/acinclude.m4 >> +++ b/acinclude.m4 >> @@ -134,9 +134,17 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_LINUX], [ >> AC_MSG_RESULT([$kversion]) >> >> if test "$version" -ge 3; then >> - : # Linux 3.x >> + if test "$patchlevel" -le 10; then >> + : # Linux 3.x >> + else >> + AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but >> version newer than 3.10.x is not supported]) >> + fi > > I think this will allow kernels with a major version greater than 3 as > long as the minor version is less than our target. > ok.
>> elif test "$version" = 2 && test "$patchlevel" -ge 6; then >> - : # Linux 2.6.x >> + if test "$sublevel" -le 31; then >> + AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but >> version 2.6.32 or later is required]) >> + else >> + : # Linux 2.6.x >> + fi >> else >> if test "$KBUILD" = "$KSRC"; then >> AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but >> version 2.6 or later is required]) > > Should we fold these two conditions together (less than 2.6.32 and > less than 2.6)? Is it worth having the KSRC == KBUILD check in the > earlier messages? ok, I will remove KSRC check. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
