On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: > diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4 > index 73ee5ce..e754cfa 100644 > --- a/acinclude.m4 > +++ b/acinclude.m4 > @@ -134,9 +134,17 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_LINUX], [ > AC_MSG_RESULT([$kversion]) > > if test "$version" -ge 3; then > - : # Linux 3.x > + if test "$patchlevel" -le 10; then > + : # Linux 3.x > + else > + AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but version > newer than 3.10.x is not supported]) > + fi
I think this will allow kernels with a major version greater than 3 as long as the minor version is less than our target. > elif test "$version" = 2 && test "$patchlevel" -ge 6; then > - : # Linux 2.6.x > + if test "$sublevel" -le 31; then > + AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but version > 2.6.32 or later is required]) > + else > + : # Linux 2.6.x > + fi > else > if test "$KBUILD" = "$KSRC"; then > AC_ERROR([Linux kernel in $KBUILD is version $kversion, but version > 2.6 or later is required]) Should we fold these two conditions together (less than 2.6.32 and less than 2.6)? Is it worth having the KSRC == KBUILD check in the earlier messages? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
