-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 22/08/13 17:19, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> Would the picks above be accepted onto the 1.11 branch?
> I would be very hesitant to put these on branch-1.11. We're very
> close to release there and this is major code restructuring. If you
> really want to go down this path, then I think it would be better
> to just pick up the kernel code in master since it's basically the
> same thing and there will be a lower chance of missing something.
> However, I'm sure that there is a much more minimal change that
> would allow 1.11 to support the newer kernels and that would seem
> the right thing to do.

Fair enough - the deltas for 3.9 and 3.10 support are quite small; I
was struggling with the changes in the 3.11 kernel in the way gre is
handled; I think the gre module in the kernel is registering as the
protocol handler before openvswitch, which then fails to register is
own handler - but I could be wrong!

- -- 
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.p...@ubuntu.com
jamesp...@debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=EYv6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to