On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:09 AM, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 21/08/13 18:01, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On 21/08/13 17:16, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> What's the status of OVS 1.12? Is this just a dev
>>>>>>>>>> branch or is it planned for release?
>>>>>> It's actually a dead branch. It looks like we're going to
>>>>>> get a few more things in and call the version after 1.11
>>>>>> 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> OK - so it sounds like I should be landing a snapshot based on
>>>> the 1.11 branch into Ubuntu Saucy - albeit with the cherry
>>>> picks for 3.10 and my patch for 3.11 ontop...
>>>>
>>>> Is that correct?
>> That sounds right to me.
>
> Great - it was a bit more complex than for the 1.12 branch as the GRE
> restructuring changes are not present in branch-1.11 and I needed
> those for the 3.11 support; here's the full list of picks I made:
>
> c405d282fb7dda49b0aaac12a30121e5f2762b16 tunneling: Remove struct
> tnl_vport and tnl_ops.
> 806b46ef3d1f3e17e87d91c4fb0041aa87709497 datapath: Move vport init to
> first port create.
> db0c31340fe260f281aaea07b0fbce41bef07c7d datapath: Kill VPORT_F_TUN_ID
> vport flag.
> 3cfede14890f1fae3a8faf7ba179018201079dc6 datapath: make skb->csum
> consistent with rest of networking stack.
> 1a02b7689b01db7fff2cda87ac311389ff524283 datapath: Use a single
> attribute array for parsing values and masks.
> 5ebaf571f9a3531d06eb52b62ac237ab7292f7b0 gre: Restructure tunneling.
> 20fcf338fe89483a600958c6e01767ee064513ce datapath: Support for Linux
> kernel 3.9.
> 9b764edf063160f3428b85cc0a1bb52bd3f51061 datapath: Support for Linux
> kernel 3.10
> 47916a6442392a93a0212e8e817953339fbf5f21 datapath: Rename
> skb_network_protocol() to __skb_network_protocol()
> 6d3e8965a2f1a4ff31db6f559d1e07f6b70e54b8 datapath: Fix uninitializaed
> variable with GRE GSO.
> 2be0b371712ddf1fc2aaac81672b2196b6df891f datapath: Make GRE support
> conditional on CONFIG_NET_IPGRE_DEMUX.
>
> and my patch for 3.11 support which I just submitted to the dev ML:
>
> ee66c2d5b852e7fee899de60463ac97789a79cea datapath: Add support for
> Linux 3.11
>
> Would the picks above be accepted onto the 1.11 branch?

I would be very hesitant to put these on branch-1.11. We're very close
to release there and this is major code restructuring. If you really
want to go down this path, then I think it would be better to just
pick up the kernel code in master since it's basically the same thing
and there will be a lower chance of missing something. However, I'm
sure that there is a much more minimal change that would allow 1.11 to
support the newer kernels and that would seem the right thing to do.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to