On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 04:32:11PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote: > Sorry for the delay in review. It took me a while to understand the design > intent to be able to understand the logic.
Thanks for the review. If the design intent is unclear, then maybe I could make the code clearer. I want my code to be easy to understand. Can you think of some change that would make it more obvious? > A design question: It seems 'seq' API expects seq numbers to be > monotonically increasing. is this true? If yes, would it make sense to add > some asserts? The seq numbers should be monotonically increasing, but I am not sure what asserts would help. What do you suggest? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
