Applied, thanks.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote: > No. there is no need any more. An incremental patch is attached that > removes all the tbl->mask_list checks. I have also rolled the last 3 patches > in to a single one in case it is useful. > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> Do we need any of the tests for tbl->mask_list at this point if we >> always allocate a list head? >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > O.K. How about the attached incremental patch? >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> > When flow table is copied, the mask list from the old table >> >> > is not properly copied into the new table. The corrupted mask >> >> > list in the new table will lead to kernel crash. This patch >> >> > fixes this bug. >> >> > >> >> > Bug #18110 >> >> > Reported-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> >> >> >> >> Can we just allocate the mask list head when we create v1 of the >> >> table? I think that would eliminate a lot of conditions and also allow >> >> us to return -ENOMEM up front rather than silent failing later on. >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
