Do we need any of the tests for tbl->mask_list at this point if we always allocate a list head?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote: > O.K. How about the attached incremental patch? > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > When flow table is copied, the mask list from the old table >> > is not properly copied into the new table. The corrupted mask >> > list in the new table will lead to kernel crash. This patch >> > fixes this bug. >> > >> > Bug #18110 >> > Reported-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> >> >> Can we just allocate the mask list head when we create v1 of the >> table? I think that would eliminate a lot of conditions and also allow >> us to return -ENOMEM up front rather than silent failing later on. > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
