On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:51:54PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > If a flow cannot be installed in the datapath, we should notice > this and not treat it as installed. This becomes an issue with > megaflows, since a batch of unique flows may come in that generate > a single new datapath megaflow that covers them. Since userspace > doesn't know whether the datapath supports megaflows, each unique > flow will get a separate flow entry (which overlap when masks are > applied) and all except the first will get rejected by a megaflow- > supporting datapath as duplicates. > > Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>
The new comment in struct flow_miss_op talks about destroying subfacets, but actually we just mark them as not installed. Same for a new comment in handle_miss_upcalls(). Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
