On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:47:49PM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote: > On 6/7/13 3:18 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >Have you considered the OpenFlow implications? OpenFlow itself is > >somewhat Ethernet centric. Improving this has been in discussion, in > >various ways, in the "extensibility" working group at ONF for a couple > >of years now, e.g. in these tickets: > > > > https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-56 > > https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-111 > > https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-112 > > > >(If you don't have an account, you'll need to get one to view those > >tickets. That should be easy for anyone at an ONF member company, > >including Cisco.) > > > >EXT-56 was resolved with OpenFlow 1.2. EXT-111 and EXT-112 are still > >unresolved, but they are also quite vague. > > Thanks for pointing this out Ben, we will join the discussion.
It's more or less stalled, I think. I suggest that we read what's there to learn what was planned, then figure out what we want to do, then bring that up on the ONF "extensibility" mailing list. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
