On 6/7/13 3:18 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:56:35AM +0300, Lori Jakab wrote:
The LISP tunneling support as of now is not yet ready for upstreaming,
for reasons outlined in this message:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2013-February/025459.html
One solution to the above issues is to make OVS less Ethernet specific,
meaning that it should accept and work with packets/flows without an
Ethernet header.
Most of this email was about the datapath implications. I'll leave
those for Jesse.
Have you considered the OpenFlow implications? OpenFlow itself is
somewhat Ethernet centric. Improving this has been in discussion, in
various ways, in the "extensibility" working group at ONF for a couple
of years now, e.g. in these tickets:
https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-56
https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-111
https://rs.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-112
(If you don't have an account, you'll need to get one to view those
tickets. That should be easy for anyone at an ONF member company,
including Cisco.)
EXT-56 was resolved with OpenFlow 1.2. EXT-111 and EXT-112 are still
unresolved, but they are also quite vague.
Thanks for pointing this out Ben, we will join the discussion.
-Lori
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
