On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jarno Rajahalme <jarno.rajaha...@nsn.com> wrote: > Eliminate the extra call to ip_select_ident(), and place the > __ip_select_ident() call where the ip_select_ident() call was. > This fixes two problems: Before, the call to ip_select_ident() did > always zero out the value set earlier by __ip_select_ident(). Also, > when __ip_select_ident() was called before setting the iph->daddr, > ident calculation was possibly based on uninitialized data (but as > the result was masked by the later call to ip_select_ident() it was > not visible). > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno.rajaha...@nsn.com>
Also applied. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
