On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:22:56AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:16:36AM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > >> It is. However, my understanding is that you were planning on > >> following Ben's suggestion to try to get the userspace portions in > >> first. In that case, there is no userspace/kernel communication to > >> speak of. If there is no benefit to exposing this interface then I'd > >> like to avoid to risk of misinterpretations in the future. > > > > The tricky part here is that the interface between dpif-netdev and > > ofproto-dpif is the same as the interface between dpif-linux and > > ofproto-dpif. >
Thanks, I should have been clearer. Its really ovs-vswtichd/datapath communication not userspace/kernel. > OK, let's just use 62 for the time being and not worry about it. Thanks, will do. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
